26 December 1806, Battle of Pultusk in Poland

Throughout history there have been many untold events that have become of immense importance or have faded into obscurity. whichever way, if you have a tidbit to share or a story to tell, please share with us.
Post Reply
Gene
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 12:16 am
United States of America

26 December 1806, Battle of Pultusk in Poland

Post by Gene »

Battle of Pultusk
26 December 1806


Summary: The Battle of Pultusk took place on December 26, 1806, during the French pursuit of the Russians across Poland. Marshal Lannes, leading the French V Corps, was ordered to advance to Pultusk. Upon arrival, in the midst of a snowstorm, they faced a Russian force commanded by General Benningsen, which was significantly larger than anticipated. Despite the numerical disadvantage, Lannes initiated an attack and initially gained ground. However, as nightfall approached, the French retreated to their starting positions, and the Russians discreetly withdrew under the veil of darkness.

The Battle:
Bennigsen arrayed his forces along the Pułtusk-Gołymin road, with three lines composed respectively of 21, 18 and 5 battalions. The left rested on the town, the right on the Mosin wood. The artillery was positioned in front of the first line. On the extreme right Major General Michael Andreas Barclay de Tolly occupied part of the Mosin wood with three battalions, a cavalry regiment and an artillery battery covering the road to Gołymin. Baggovut covered the left of the line and the bridge over the Narew from a position in front of the ravine with ten battalions, two squadrons of dragoons and an artillery battery. Deployed along the edge of the ridge were 28 squadrons of cavalry linking Barclay de Tolly and Baggovut. Cossack cavalry was deployed in front of them.

Marshal Lannes had orders to cross the Narew at Pułtusk with his corps. He was aware that there was a Russian force in front of him but did not know its size. After struggling through the mud, his first troops reached the area at about 10:00 AM,[23] and drove the Cossacks back onto the Russian main line. Because of the terrain, Lannes could only see the Russian advance positions on the extreme left and right with the cavalry between them.

Lannes deployed Suchet's division on his left, opposite the Mosin wood. Gazan's division covered the rest of the Russian line. The few guns were deployed on the left and in the center.

At about 11:00 AM the French right advanced against Baggovut. The Russian Cossacks and cavalry were driven back and Baggovut sent forward a Jäger unit, which was driven back despite artillery support. The French center had also advanced, to attack Baggovut from the flank. But this maneuver exposed them to the Russian cavalry line, seven squadrons of which suddenly attacked the French flank in a sudden snowstorm while Baggovut's cavalry and the Jagers attacked from the front. A French infantry battalion then took the Russian cavalry in their flank. After a confused melee the Russians fell back to their original position. Lannes's cavalry division, under Trelliard tried to advance but was driven off by artillery fire. At the same time as the French right attacked, on the French left Suchet's division, led by Lannes in person, attacked the position held by Barclay. The initial attack drove the Russians out of the wood, and captured the battery stationed there, but Barclay's reserve drove the French back into the wood and recaptured the guns.

The French center had also advanced. The Russian cavalry withdrew behind the main line, exposing the French to artillery fire from the Russian batteries.

By about 2 pm the French position looked dangerous. The Russian left had held, the French center was suffering from the artillery fire, and on the right increasing pressure was beginning to force Suchet's men out of the wood. A French retreat looked a distinct possibility when unexpected reinforcements arrived. The 3rd Division of Davout's 3rd Corps, temporarily commanded by his Chief of Staff Fournier, had been ordered to pursue a Russian column apparently retiring on Pułtusk. Concerned about the strength of the Russian cavalry force, which was escorting guns and stores, Fournier had pursued but not engaged. He was preparing to stop for the night when he heard the sounds of combat to his right, and so marched his men towards Pułtusk. Due to the state of the roads, he was only able to bring up one gun.

Seeing this force approach, Bennigsen wheeled back his main line to face the wood, thus reducing the artillery fire directed at Lannes's units. Barclay, finding Fournier attacking his right flank, fell back to the right of the main Russian line. Bennigsen reinforced him with two infantry regiments and some cavalry and directed an artillery battery to fire on the wood. Thus, reinforced Barclay attacked the wood. The French were driven out, and Fournier's right flank exposed. This was attacked by twenty squadrons of Russian cavalry, but the 85th French Infantry Regiment formed squares and by a steady fire drove the cavalry off. At about 8:00 PM the combat died away, and Fournier retired to the edge of the woods.

The arrival of Fournier's division also had an effect on the French right wing. With the switch of much of the Russian artillery to support Barclay de Tolly, the French were able to use their own guns to support a fresh attack at about 2:00 PM on Baggovut by the brigades of Claparede and Vedel, supported by Gazan on their left. Baggovut's men were driven back over the ravine in their rear, and their guns captured. Ostermann-Tolstoy established a battery to Barclay's right and reinforced by five battalions he attacked. After a desperate fight the French were thrown back and the guns recaptured. The French right and center fell back to their start positions as night fell.

During the night, Bennigsen decided to retire, and did so the next day, 27 December, using the longer road to Różan along the east bank of the Narew. From there he continued his retreat to Ostrołęka. Fournier's division also moved off to rejoin the 3rd Corps at Golymin. Lannes was in no position to pursue the Russians, and occupied Pułtusk on 28 December.

The Result: Losses on both sides are disputed. Lannes claimed the Russians lost 2,000 killed, 3,000 wounded and 1,800 prisoners, a total of 6,800; Sir Robert Wilson, British liaison officer with the Russian army, claimed the Russians lost less than 5,000 men. Lannes admitted 700 French killed and 1,500 wounded; Russian authorities said the French losses were 7,000 killed and wounded and 70 prisoners. Given that the French were attacking and exposed to artillery fire, a total for them of 7,000 killed, wounded and prisoners does not seem unreasonable, and a total of 5,000 casualties for the Russians seems a good estimate. Petre quotes the various authorities. Another authority gives French losses as five generals and 140 officers killed or wounded, 3,200 soldiers dead or wounded, and 700 captured. Russian losses are stated as 3,500 total, including 1,500 men and 12 guns captured. On the French side, Lannes, Bonnard, Claparede and Vedel were all wounded.

Bennigsen claimed a victory. The consensus seems to be that having decided to fight, in defiance of his orders he could have better disposed his forces, taken the offensive and destroyed Lannes's corps before Fournier came up. Bennigsen said he thought he was facing 60,000 French under Napoleon in person, which may explain his defensive stance. Bennigsen also complained that Buxhoeveden did not support him, but that officer was obeying his orders to retire.

Lannes, on the other hand, was following his orders, and the result was to find himself facing a superior force in a good defensive position. Napoleon's orders had not allowed for this, and unaware of the odds against him, Lannes attacked. If Fournier had not used his initiative and marched to the sound of the guns, the result may have been very different.


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of ... usk_(1806)
Gene
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 12:16 am
United States of America

Re: 26 December 1806, Battle of Pultusk in Poland

Post by Gene »

The Battle of Pułtusk, fought on December 26, 1806, during the War of the Fourth Coalition, exemplifies the profound impact of environmental conditions on military operations. This engagement, which saw the forces of Napoleon Bonaparte's Grande Armée clashing with Russian troops under General Bennigsen, was significantly influenced by adverse weather conditions, rendering it a grueling ordeal for both sides involved.

The period leading up to the battle was characterized by unusually mild autumn weather in the Pułtusk region, which delayed the onset of the freezing temperatures typically expected. However, the eventual arrival of colder weather led to a brief period of frosts, temporarily making the inadequate roads more navigable.

This respite was short-lived, as the weather soon warmed again, causing a notable two-day thaw on December 26 and 27. The thaw turned the ground into a difficult morass, complicating maneuverability, particularly for the French forces who were attempting to advance. The conditions were so severe that Marshal Louis-Nicolas Davout reported it took his troops approximately two hours to cover merely 2.5 miles, a testament to the quagmire that the battlefield had become.

The narrowness of the roads and the challenging topography of the terrain further exacerbated the difficulties faced by both armies. These environmental hurdles not only impeded the movement of troops but also severely hindered the transportation of artillery and supplies, elements crucial to Napoleonic warfare.

Captain Marcellin Marbot, serving with Augereau's Corps, provided a vivid account of the conditions, highlighting the incessant rain and snow, the scarcity of provisions, and the dire state of accommodations. His description paints a picture of an army struggling not just against the enemy, but against the elements themselves, battling for basic necessities in a hostile landscape.

The battle's outcome, while tactically indecisive, underscored the significant role that environmental factors can play in warfare. The severe weather conditions and the resulting terrain challenges contributed as much to the difficulties encountered by both the French and Russian forces as the strategic and tactical decisions made by their commanders. The Battle of Pułtusk serves as a compelling case study in the complexities of military logistics and the impact of weather on historical outcomes, illustrating how victory or defeat can be as much a matter of battling the elements as engaging the enemy.
Post Reply