Here’s a concise overview of my approach:
- National Historical Archives - These are invaluable resources, offering access to personal letters, journals, and other primary documents. They provide direct insight into the thoughts and experiences of individuals from the period. However, there are challenges. Most documents are in their original languages, requiring careful translation. Additionally, understanding the historical context is crucial; misinterpreting the events described can lead to significant errors.
- - Historical Books by Historians and Authors - Secondary sources are another key component of my research. While many are meticulously researched, some pose challenges. Bias can skew interpretations, with authors favoring specific nationalities, methods, or perspectives. Others may rely heavily on existing works, inadvertently perpetuating earlier inaccuracies. Even when translating original documents, errors—though often unintentional—can occur. This is why I read critically, comparing interpretations across multiple authors to identify reliable conclusions.
- - Cross-Checking and Verification - My background in intelligence has instilled a strong habit of cross-checking all information. For any historical point to be included in the game, I ensure it's corroborated by at least two independent sources, such as personal letters or firsthand accounts. This double-checking (sometimes triple checking) process can delay responses or updates, which at times frustrates my collaborators, but I believe accuracy is worth the extra effort. This diligence ensures the final product reflects historical authenticity.
I sincerely hope this reply answers the question thoroughly. Please refer to this response if the question crops again. Thank you.